![]() – than others, and this is necessarily reflected in the distribution of cases included in the database. Similarly, some conflict situations generate more interest – from the media, NGOs, legal and academic circles, etc. This is largely because such instances are not as widely reported as those in which the law is violated. While utmost care has been taken to cross-reference sources to ensure their accuracy, it is often difficult to obtain undisputed confirmation of instances in which IHL has been observed correctly. Their inclusion is not to be taken as an endorsement of any past violations they are reproduced merely to show how practice can evolve over time and that respect for and violations of IHL often occur in the same context. Several cases demonstrate how behaviour changed over time and therefore also refer to the violations that precipitated the need for such change. Neither can it be perceived as legitimizing the behaviour of any belligerents. Where cases illustrate examples of respect for IHL, under no circumstances must this be perceived as minimizing any violations that may have occurred in the same conflict situations. No description of facts in any document reproduced on this website can be construed as the opinion of the ICRC or of the authors. The opinions expressed in the cases included on this website are not to be taken as those of the ICRC or of the authors. ![]() The aim of this database is solely to encourage practice-oriented thinking on compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL) and the elements that underpin it, by providing a selection of documents and resources on past and current practice in this domain. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |